Roughing Balm V2

Accessory by Neo Inception
19.95 In stock.
Free shipping Free shipping to USA

Add to wishlist | Get 200 VI Points for this purchase.

Roughing Balm V2

19.95 usd

Accessory by Neo Inception (19.95)

In stock.

Here's the perfect way to create rough-smooth decks - the secret of many magicians and mentalists!

Roughing Balm Version 2 is our new, improved release - easier and more convenient to use than the original - for Roughing cards.

Roughing Balm Version 2 is designed in a flat shape (the original's shape was round).

It's easy - simply rub the center of the card up and down by using this flat Roughing Balm. It's easy and quick to Rough an entire deck in a very short time. (The existing original required you to paint the roughing balm irregularly several times. See the difference?)

With this advanced Roughing Balm, you can do your Roughing work more conveniently and in a more stable fashion.

Roughing Balm Version 2 contains enough material to make 50 Invisible Decks, so your Roughing work is available for more than 2,500 cards!

 

Customer reviews for Roughing Balm V2

Reviewer

Gary

Pros
This is an improved version over the original.
Relatively cheap to buy.
It’s easy to use because of the new design
It’s quick to rough an entire deck and achieve a good finish.
The roughing balm will last a lifetime. (The ad copy says for 50 decks but only time will tell if this can be achieved).

Cons
There may be other products that give a better performance. e.g Science Friction Spray. However this is very costly.

 

Community questions about Roughing Balm V2

Have a question about this product? It's possible others do too. Ask here and other Vanishing Inc. Magic customers will be able to respond with assistance! Alternatively, email us and we can help too.

  • Robert asks: How much difference is this roughing balm compared to the stick roughing balm

    • 1. Vanishing Inc. Magic responds: The main difference is the way the stick is contained. One is in a chapstick tube and the other is just a stick. The formulas are a little different as well but they both achieve the same goal.
Ask a question